Feasibility of in-bed exercise testing using a clamp-on pedaling device: A single-center pragmatic study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21542/gcsp.2025.63Abstract
Background: Exercise stress testing is the gold standard for evaluating peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension, but traditional treadmill testing has operational limitations including need for patient transport, specialized facilities, and inability to perform invasive hemodynamic monitoring during exercise.
Methods: This prospective single-center feasibility study enrolled 54 consecutive patients undergoing ABI (n=35) or RHC (n=19) procedures at Owensboro Medical Practice. The Bedside Bike (Bedside Bike, LLC; 510(k)-exempt Class I device, product code ION) was integrated into routine vascular laboratory and catheterization laboratory workflows. Primary endpoints included exercise completion rates, data interpretability, and safety. Prespecified success criteria were: completion rate ≥90% and interpretability ≥80% for ABI; completion rate ≥90% and interpretability ≥70% for RHC; system usability ≥80% for both.
Results: Exercise was attempted in 94.4% (51/54; 95% CI: 87.0-100%) of patients with a 94.1% (48/51; 95% CI: 86.3-100%) completion rate among those who attempted. Data interpretability was excellent: 97.1% (34/35; 95% CI: 91.4-100%) for ABI and 84.2% (16/19; 95% CI: 68.4-100%) for RHC. All prespecified feasibility criteria were met. System usability ratings were 85.7% (95% CI: 74.3-97.1%) for ABI and 89.5% (95% CI: 73.7-100%) for RHC. Adverse events were minor and occurred in 14.3% of ABI and 5.3% of RHC procedures. Among RHC patients with paired measurements, median cardiac output increased from 4.0 [IQR: 3.8-4.7] L/min at rest to 5.0 [4.8-6.5] L/min with exercise, with a median mPAP/CO slope of 8.26 [6.88-14.12] mmHg/L/min.
Conclusions: This feasibility study demonstrates that bedside exercise testing using a portable pedaling device is technically feasible, safe, and well-tolerated for both ABI and RHC procedures. These preliminary results support larger studies to evaluate diagnostic validity and clinical utility.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Neil K. Jairath, Joshua Mijares, Kishor M. Vora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.